Credibility Assessment Dashboard

Overview of credibility concerns for officials documented in this accountability project

4
Compromised
0
With Concerns
2
Not Applicable

This dashboard summarizes credibility assessments for public officials based on their sworn testimony, documented actions, and involvement in accountability matters.

Credibility Compromised

These individuals have documented credibility concerns based on sworn testimony, evidence destruction, or other factors that materially impact the reliability of their statements.

Chad Cronkright

Deputy Sheriff • St. Clair County Sheriff's Office

Compromised

Deleted text messages after being notified of investigation (sworn testimony).

Credibility Factors

Evidence handling Deleted messages after notification of investigation (sworn testimony)
View Full Profile
Damon Duva

Deputy Sheriff • St. Clair County Sheriff's Office

Compromised

Admitted under oath to deleting text messages. Close personal friends with both the arrestee and the Sheriff for decades.

Credibility Factors

Evidence handling Deleted text messages (sworn testimony)
Neutrality Severely Compromised
Relationship to arrestee Close Friend (15-20 years)
Relationship to sheriff Former patrol partners (20+ years)
View Full Profile
Mat King

Sheriff • St. Clair County Sheriff's Office

Compromised

Failed to recuse despite direct family relationship with arrestee. Department he commands investigated his own brother's arrest.

Credibility Factors

Neutrality Severely Compromised
Recusal Failed to recuse
Relationship to arrestee Brother
View Full Profile
Matthew Pohl

Captain • St. Clair County Sheriff's Office

Compromised

Admitted under oath to deleting text messages. Friends with the arrestee he was supposed to be objectively investigating.

Credibility Factors

Evidence handling Deleted text messages (sworn testimony)
Neutrality Compromised
Relationship to arrestee Close Friend
View Full Profile

Understanding Credibility Assessments

Credibility assessments on this site are based on documented evidence including:

  • Sworn Testimony - Statements made under oath in depositions and court proceedings
  • Evidence Handling - Actions related to preservation or destruction of evidence
  • Conflicts of Interest - Personal relationships that may bias judgment
  • Policy Compliance - Adherence to department policies and legal requirements
  • Consistency - Whether statements are consistent over time and with documentary evidence

These assessments are based solely on publicly available information and sworn testimony. They represent editorial analysis of documented facts, not legal determinations.